The life science of Fullerene Chemistry of the three 1996 Nobel Laureates in Chemistry was based on Buckminster Fuller’s synergistic engineering principles, which challenged the foundation of 20th century science. Harvard University Novatis Professor Amy Edmonson, in her online book titled ‘The Fuller Explanation’, explains that Buckminster Fuller derived his engineering principles from the mathematics of the Greek philosopher Plato. Most people have heard of the term ‘platonic love’ and now that the fullerene-platonic chemistry has come into existence, we might ask ourselves the question, what practical engineering principles might be associated with platonic love?
To answer that question, we can examine how the new chemistry challenges the general understanding of modern science. NASA’s High Energy Astrophysics Division Library has published papers arguing that the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy was based on fractal geometric logic. All life sciences within the current accepted understanding of science can only try to move species towards extinction. This is because Einstein’s ‘First Law of All Science’ calls for the total destruction of all life in the universe when all its heat radiates out into cold space. On the other hand, Plato’s ethical logic is based on fractal geometry, which we know extends the science of life to infinity. The New Measure of Humanity Project at the University of Florence, on September 24, 2010, was honored with the Georgio Napolitano Medal on behalf of the Republic of Italy. The upgrade of the Project from quantum mechanics to quantum biology, was in accordance with the logic of Plato.
The practical engineering principles we seek pertain to the difference between aesthetics and ethics. Ethics can now be seen as part of science itself, rather than just being about how we use science. We can explain the difference in simplistic terms instead of complex electromagnetic biological terms that belong to quantum biology. We know that the old chemistry we have, in fact, obeys Einstein’s law of universal decay. However, we know from the discovery of Sir Isaac Newton’s unpublished papers, discovered last century, that Newton firmly believed that a deeper natural philosophy existed to balance the energetic breakdown of the mechanical universe. Newton’s principles, responsible for this balance, belonged to Plato’s lost ‘Science for Ethical Purposes’.
During the 18th century, the philosopher Immanuel Kant defined aesthetics as the theory of art appreciation, but he also looked for ethical technology within the electromagnetic theories of his day, an electric motor to make what we know by comparison as a child’s toy . Kantian aesthetics in the 21st century has become the basis of a moral logic to guide various types of organizations. There is a resurgent interest in ethical electromagnetic biological science, due to the new platonic-fulerene chemistry.
Any aesthetic awareness in the beauty of, say, a painting of a beautiful mountain range with majestic waterfalls, is about seeing the beauty decaying, the waterfalls eating away at the structure of the mountain. The aesthetic feeling, therefore, belongs to the material world of destructive reality, but it inspires in the mind a peaceful harmonic creative intuition. Medicine Nobel Laureate Svent-Gyoergyi was so insistent that this material decomposition was balanced by the evolution of consciousness that he called scientists who did not realize this crazy apes and wrote a book by that title. Now we can begin to think that the mental harmonics associated with the Marialist aesthetic and the evolution of the mind could have some great universal ethical purpose and start looking for the new technologies that Immanuel Kant intuitively glimpsed. These are the principles of spiritual or holographic optical engineering that Plato wrote about.
The harmonic balance of the decomposition of matter with the more natural deep balance philosophy of Sir Isaac Newton, describes a kind of entanglement between the energies of decomposition and the evolving creative consciousness. This is known as quantum entanglement, a process that exists between quantum mechanics and quantum biology. Biologist Dr. Carl Johan Calleman, author of the book ‘The Purposeful Universe’ has quantified the functioning of the human cell. This allows us to identify the rather incredible nature of the electromagnetic ethical technology sought by Immanuel Kant.
Dr. Callerman points out that the male sperm is propelled towards the egg by a small electromagnetic motor that drives its tail. Upon entering the ovum, the male engine transforms into a balanced Yin-Yang life engine. This spark of life programs has a universal message of evolution towards the first bone created within the embryo, the sphenoid bone. The sphenoid vibrates with the seashell design of the inner ear, to provide the electromagnetic music of life that Plato referred to as the Pythagorean Music of the Spheres. Dr. Richard Merrick of the University of Texas, in his book ‘Interference’ has traced the electromagnetic workings of the Music of the Music of the Spheres within the workings of evolving consciousness.
The Australian Science and Art Research Center discovered the mathematical structure of the Music of the Spheres that governs the evolution of seashells over millions of years through space-time The discovery was reprinted by the research institute world’s largest technology IEEE SPIE Milestone Series in Washington in 1990 In 1995, the work won the Biology Award from the Institute for Basic Research for the discovery of new physical laws governing optimal biological growth and development through space-time. Since then, it has been discovered that the human sphenoid sings the same song of life as the Music of the Spheres, which means that it is now possible to discover a practical technology from what was once called the optical spiritual engineering principles of Plato.
The Center for Science and Art obtained experimental evidence for the existence of Plato’s spiritual optics through the use of special 3-D glasses by discovering that, over the centuries, some artists had unconsciously depicted holographic images in their paintings. The new technology is about the evolution of humanity’s understanding of the nature of Einstein’s protégé, David Bohm’s infinite holographic universe. Now that the difference between aesthetics and ethics is understood, humanity stands on the threshold of what Buckminster Fuller called Uopia or Oblivion.
Within the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy, Aristotle’s ethical science was designed to become the basis for an ennobling medical policy for the health of the universe, so that the universe would not allow civilization to die out. Platonic-Fullerenic Chemistry is part of that political medical science and has no place for any aesthetic obsession to dominate politics or religious beliefs. For example, the aesthetic appreciation of blonde, blue-eyed people becoming a superior race is unethical, and neither is using the aesthetics of Angel Physics to legalize the torture and burning alive of countless women and children as witches.
Dr. Luc Montagnier, winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine, is among an emerging group of scholars who claim evidence has been obtained to show that DNA can carry imprints of itself electromagnetically. For teleportation to be ethical, it would be necessary to change the general assumption that nature will find some way to eliminate overpopulation. Transparent global medical scientific research, available to the people, must exist to allow ethical debate on such issues to occur. That same process, acting despite being governed by the current understanding of unbalanced entropic decay, will prove the existence of new technologies, for the betterment of the human condition, far beyond the ability of an entropic mindset to even imagine.
Professor Robert Pope (C)